A new paper (full paper here) by Compton et al. in Ecology Letters evaluates the costs to ecosystem services due to the many ways in which humans add excess nitrogen into the environment through both non-point sources such as agricultural runoff and point-source pollution from electrical utilities. The authors conclude that “Damage costs outweigh the costs associated with reducing N loading. This provides a strong rationale for mitigation of N pollution and the associated effects on ecosystem services. The fact that these initial estimates (Table 2) are incomplete means that our analysis almost certainly underestimates the societal benefits to mitigating the negative effects of nitrogen pollution.”
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- New paper examines how multiple aspects of climate change affect biodiversity loss
- Society for Conservation Biology is hiring a North America Policy Director
- Perceptive new paper critiques the “New Conservation Science”
- New study forecasts genetic risks to wolves in western US unless dispersal can connect isolated populations
- New version of Connectivity Analysis Toolkit (1.3.1) released
- Society for Conservation Biology meeting hosts symposium on defining the meaning of endangered species recovery
- SCB seeks a director for the North American Policy Program
- New version of the Connectivity Analysis Toolkit (1.3.0) released
- Does wolf recovery trigger trophic cascades?: New research from Yellowstone, the Great Lakes, and Europe
- New paper and software for detecting dispersal barriers and restoring habitat connectivity
-
Links