Recovery goals for endangered species are commonly based on the population size thought sufficient to ensure viability (the concept of minimum viable population or MVP). More recently, authors such as Soule et al. (2005) have proposed that recovery goals for strongly-interacting or keystone species be defined based on the population size sufficient to recover that keystone role. A new paper by Estes and colleagues analyzes how such a strategy could be used to define recovery goals for sea otters. Defining such thresholds may be more difficult in terrestrial ecosystems (see a forthcoming paper on this topic by Christina Eisenberg and colleagues: Eisenberg, Cristina, K. Norman Johnson, Hal Salwasser, and Jerry Franklin, “Ecologically Effective Populations and Trophic Cascades: The Potential for Wolf Recovery to Shift Conservation Policy,” BioScience ).
-
Search It!
-
Recent Entries
- New paper examines how multiple aspects of climate change affect biodiversity loss
- Society for Conservation Biology is hiring a North America Policy Director
- Perceptive new paper critiques the “New Conservation Science”
- New study forecasts genetic risks to wolves in western US unless dispersal can connect isolated populations
- New version of Connectivity Analysis Toolkit (1.3.1) released
- Society for Conservation Biology meeting hosts symposium on defining the meaning of endangered species recovery
- SCB seeks a director for the North American Policy Program
- New version of the Connectivity Analysis Toolkit (1.3.0) released
- Does wolf recovery trigger trophic cascades?: New research from Yellowstone, the Great Lakes, and Europe
- New paper and software for detecting dispersal barriers and restoring habitat connectivity
-
Links